Frequently Asked Questions
Does Stratum AI replace traditional geostatistics?

No. Stratum AI complements traditional geostatistical workflows. AI-generated domains and outputs can be integrated into conventional estimation methods such as kriging, following existing site standards.

How are SAIGE models validated?

Models are validated through internal consistency checks, comparison with existing site models, reconciliation against production data where available, and review by site technical teams.

How does the model handle new or incoming data?

SAIGE models can be updated as new drilling, grade control, or operational data becomes available, allowing the model to evolve alongside the mine.

Is SAIGE suitable for greenfields exploration?

No. Stratum AI focuses on production-mines and brownfield environments, where sufficient data density and geological control exist to support reliable modelling and operational decision-making.

Is the AI process a black box?

No. Stratum AI’s models are designed to be interpretable and grounded in geological reasoning. We provide visibility into how different data inputs influence predictions and how spatial relationships are learned, allowing technical teams to review results at a block-by-block level.

What data is required to run SAIGE models?

Stratum AI uses existing site data, including geological logs, assays, and operational datasets. No additional data collection programs are required to generate models.

What spatial scale do the models operate at?

Models operate at block scale and are designed to respect geological continuity while capturing local variability that may be smoothed by traditional approaches.

How does Stratum ensure models reflect site knowledge?

Stratum AI works closely with site geologists and engineers to incorporate geological understanding and operational constraints into the modelling process.

Where does SAIGE deliver the most value?

SAIGE delivers the greatest value in areas such as grade control, mine planning, brownfield expansion, and reconciliation, where improved spatial understanding directly impacts economic outcomes.

Who is responsible for final model approval and reporting?

Final model validation, estimation, and public reporting remain the responsibility of the site team and the Competent or Qualified Person, following NI 43-101 / JORC guidelines.

How are results delivered to site teams?

Model outputs can be exported in standard formats compatible with existing mine planning and geological software, ensuring integration with current workflows.

Can SAIGE model variables beyond grade?

Yes. In addition to grade, SAIGE can model mineral and rock characteristics such as hardness, fines generation, and other parameters relevant to processing and geotechnical performance.